このページはフレーム対応ブラウザ用に作成されています。下のリンクは非フレーム使用ページですのでそちらをご覧ください。
この記事をプリントする
予防外交はどうなっているの?
予防外交はどうなっているのか
筆者は10年ほど前、民族紛争を逃れて
コソボ自治州を離れたアルバニア人に
取材したことがある。
現在、深刻化しているコソボ紛争を見ると、
あのころもっと積極的対策がとられていたらと
思われてならない。
Where'S Preventive Diplomacy?
By DAVID ZOPPETTI
About 10 years ago, I did a documentary for Japanese television about people
seeking political asylum in Switzerland. Among the people I interviewed were
a great number of Albanian refugees from the province of Kosovo.
They had walked for days and days across land and mountains. They had
crossed borders at night, carrying their children in their arms after giving
them sleeping pills to ensure they wouldn't wake up and draw the attention
of border patrols.
They told me they were fleeing from the atrocities committed in the name
of "ethnic cleansing" by the Serbs. They showed me video tapes of people
who had been tortured and killed, of concentration camps resembling those
of World War II and of mass execution graves, visions of horror from another
age.
The television network for which I worked was not eager to air this
footage, nor was it willing to let me go to Kosovo to do a follow-up on
the story. "It is too dangerous," they said, "and all of this is not very
relevant to Jap
anese viewers."
Of course, this decision made me furious at the time. But the real
problem is that the entire international community showed a similar attitude toward the crisis in Kosovo. For years, everyone was aware of what was going
on there, but nothing was done about it.
Four or five years later, I did another shoot, this time regarding the
role of the United Nations during peacekeeping operations in Somalia.
This program focused on "preventive diplomacy," a concept introduced by
the former general secretary of the United Nations, Boutros Boutros-Ghali,
in his book "Agenda for Peace."
"Once a conflict erupts somewhere," he explained during a press
conference in Nairobi after a visit to Somalia, "it is usually extremely
difficult to solve and usually generates huge refugee problems. Peace
enforcement and peacekeeping operations are also very expensive and time
consuming. Preventive diplomacy should be an option to consider by member
countries (of the United Nations) to avoid such situations."
In other words, more should be done at an early stage, when peaceful
resolution of conflicts is still possible.
But the concept of preventive diplomacy never really set off a spark of
enthusiasm in the international community. The ongoing crisis in and around
the Republic of Yugoslavia is tragic proof of this.
And despite great displays of sincerity by politicians, I cannot help
thinking that it is basially because a lot of people benefit more from war
than from peace, starting with the military, the weapons manufacturers and
arms dealers of the world. Meanwhile those who don't benefit are left to
deal with all the pain and tragedy left behind.
I wish reality would prove this to be a rather exaggerated and distorted
view of things. Unfortunately, it doesn't. This century started with a war
in the Balkans and is about to end with another one in the same place. Have
we not become any wiser in all these years?
About 10 years ago, I did a documentary for Japanese television about people
seeking political asylum in Switzerland. Among the people I interviewed were
a great number of Albanian refugees from the province of Kosovo.
They had walked for days and days across land and mountains. They had
crossed borders at night, carrying their children in their arms after giving
them sleeping pills to ensure they wouldn't wake up and draw the attention
of border patrols.
They told me they were fleeing from the atrocities committed in the name
of "ethnic cleansing" by the Serbs. They showed me video tapes of people
who had been tortured and killed, of concentration camps resembling those
of World War II and of mass execution graves, visions of horror from another
age.
The television network for which I worked was not eager to air this
footage, nor was it willing to let me go to Kosovo to do a follow-up on
the story. "It is too dangerous," they said, "and all of this is not very
relevant to Jap
anese viewers."
Of course, this decision made me furious at the time. But the real
problem is that the entire international community showed a similar attitude toward the crisis in Kosovo. For years, everyone was aware of what was going
on there, but nothing was done about it.
Four or five years later, I did another shoot, this time regarding the
role of the United Nations during peacekeeping operations in Somalia.
This program focused on "preventive diplomacy," a concept introduced by
the former general secretary of the United Nations, Boutros Boutros-Ghali,
in his book "Agenda for Peace."
"Once a conflict erupts somewhere," he explained during a press
conference in Nairobi after a visit to Somalia, "it is usually extremely
difficult to solve and usually generates huge refugee problems. Peace
enforcement and peacekeeping operations are also very expensive and time
consuming. Preventive diplomacy should be an option to consider by member
countries (of the United Nations) to avoid such situations."
In other words, more should be done at an early stage, when peaceful
resolution of conflicts is still possible.
But the concept of preventive diplomacy never really set off a spark of
enthusiasm in the international community. The ongoing crisis in and around
the Republic of Yugoslavia is tragic proof of this.
And despite great displays of sincerity by politicians, I cannot help
thinking that it is basially because a lot of people benefit more from war
than from peace, starting with the military, the weapons manufacturers and
arms dealers of the world. Meanwhile those who don't benefit are left to
deal with all the pain and tragedy left behind.
I wish reality would prove this to be a rather exaggerated and distorted
view of things. Unfortunately, it doesn't. This century started with a war
in the Balkans and is about to end with another one in the same place. Have
we not become any wiser in all these years?
Shukan ST: April 23, 1999
(C) All rights reserved
- seeking political asylum in 〜
- 〜 に政治亡命しようとする
- Albanian refugees
- アルバニア人難民
- province of Kosovo
- コソボ自治州
- sleeping pills
- 睡眠薬
- ensure
- 確実にする
- border patrols
- 国境警備隊
- were fleeing from 〜
- 〜 から逃げている
- atrocities
- 残虐行為
- 〜 committed in the name of 〜
- 〜 と称して行なわれている 〜
- "ethnic cleansing"
- 「民族浄化」
- Serbs
- セルビア人
- had been tortured
- 拷問された
- concentration camps
- 強制収容所
- resembling 〜
- 〜 に似た
- mass execution graves
- 大量殺りくされた人々の埋葬所
- air
- 放映する
- footage
- フィルム
- follow-up
- 追跡調査
- is not very relevant to 〜
- 〜 に強い関連がない
- viewers
- 視聴者
- made 〜 furious
- 〜 を激怒させた
- similar attitude
- 同じような態度
- crisis
- 危機
- shoot
- 撮影
- regarding 〜
- 〜 に関して
- role
- 役割
- United Nations
- 国連
- peacekeeping operations
- 平和維持活動
- concept
- 概念
- former general secretary
- 前事務総長
- Once a conflict erupts somewhere
- いったんどこかで紛争がぼっ発したら
- press conference
- 記者会見
- generate
- 発生させる
- enforcement
- 執行
- time consuming
- 時間のかかる
- peaceful resolution
- 平和的解決
- never really set off a spark of enthusiasm
- 強い関心を引くということはなかった
- tragic proof
- 悲惨な証拠
- great displays of sincerity
- 非常な誠意を表すこと
- benefit
- 利益を得る
- weapons manufacturers
- 兵器製造業者
- arms dealers
- 武器商人
- are left to deal with 〜
- 〜 に対処しなければならない
- 〜 left behind
- あとに残された 〜
- I wish reality would prove this to be 〜
- 現実が私のこの考えを 〜 だと証明してくれればいいと思う
- rather exaggerated and distorted view of things
- 大げさでゆがんだ見方
- war in the Balkans
- バルカン諸国(アルバニア、ブルガリア、ギリシャ、ユーゴスラビア連邦、ボスニア・ヘルツェゴビナ、マケドニアなど)での戦争。バルカン戦争は第1次が1912-1913年、第2次が1913年。