このページはフレーム対応ブラウザ用に作成されています。下のリンクは非フレーム使用ページですのでそちらをご覧ください。
この記事をプリントする
社会的ルールを忘れて
社会的ルールを忘れて
日本各地の市町村で、住民たちが
オウム真理教の信徒らの転入を拒否している。
社会問題には通常、対立するグループの
どちらかの意見に賛成する筆者も、
今回ばかりは住民側と信徒側の
両方の言い分が正しく、
そして同時に間違っていると思える。
Forgetting the Rules
By SCOTT T. HARDS
Around Japan, dozens of local communities are up in arms over some young
people who have moved into their neighborhoods: the followers of Aum
Shinrikyo. Citizens are parading in the streets and yelling into megaphones
for the people of Aum to get out, while Aum spokespeople counter with
proclamations of their constitutional rights to live where they choose.
Interestingly, in most social conflicts I take sides, perceiving one
group to be clearly right and another to be wrong. I cannot remember a
time, like now with the current Aum uproar, when I've seen both sides in a
conflict to be both so right, and so wrong, at the same time.
Consider the local citizens: They understandably fear living close to
individuals from an organization that is guilty of one of the most
incomprehensible acts of terrorism in modern Japanese history — the sarin
attacks on the Tokyo subways — as well as at least three other major acts of
murder or poisoning.
While this response is perfectly understandable on an emotional level,
these protests, local merchants' refusal to accept Aum members as
customers and municipal governments' refusal to register them as local
citizens are, in fact, blatant violations of their constitutional and human
rights.
The individuals guilty of the terrorist actions of a few years ago are in
prison and no longer a threat. Local citizens are punishing these other Aum
members simply because of their association with the group, despite the fact
that the vast majority of them are probably innocent of any wrongdoing.
This kind of guilt by association, the stripping of the rights of an
entire group of people simply because of their membership in that group, is
not something we can allow to exist in modern society.
Such logic has been used to justify some of the most brutal massacres
and crimes against humanity that have ever taken place. Those citizens'
chants remind me, frankly, of medieval witch hunts. The Aum spokespeople
complaining about this treatment are right on the mark when they argue that
it is illegal and should be ended.
However, though what these Aum representatives are saying is entirely
true and correct, they demonstrate at the same time a stunning lack of
comprehension of the basic rules that govern human society.
Even if the individual members are not guilty of anything, their
organization clearly is. But has any Aum spokesperson ever held a press conference to apologize for the horrors brought upon Japan by the group's
previous leaders? What about when a group of them decides on a new place to
live? What about visiting the local neighbors beforehand, repeating their
apology and making a promise that they won't cause any trouble?
While such actions are not required by any law, these are the sorts of manners and customs that lubricate interaction between people on a day-to-day basis.
As such, it's no surprise that without any grease between the wheels,
these Aum members are creating friction with the people around them.
Around Japan, dozens of local communities are up in arms over some young
people who have moved into their neighborhoods: the followers of Aum
Shinrikyo. Citizens are parading in the streets and yelling into megaphones
for the people of Aum to get out, while Aum spokespeople counter with
proclamations of their constitutional rights to live where they choose.
Interestingly, in most social conflicts I take sides, perceiving one
group to be clearly right and another to be wrong. I cannot remember a
time, like now with the current Aum uproar, when I've seen both sides in a
conflict to be both so right, and so wrong, at the same time.
Consider the local citizens: They understandably fear living close to
individuals from an organization that is guilty of one of the most
incomprehensible acts of terrorism in modern Japanese history — the sarin
attacks on the Tokyo subways — as well as at least three other major acts of
murder or poisoning.
While this response is perfectly understandable on an emotional level,
these protests, local merchants' refusal to accept Aum members as
customers and municipal governments' refusal to register them as local
citizens are, in fact, blatant violations of their constitutional and human
rights.
The individuals guilty of the terrorist actions of a few years ago are in
prison and no longer a threat. Local citizens are punishing these other Aum
members simply because of their association with the group, despite the fact
that the vast majority of them are probably innocent of any wrongdoing.
This kind of guilt by association, the stripping of the rights of an
entire group of people simply because of their membership in that group, is
not something we can allow to exist in modern society.
Such logic has been used to justify some of the most brutal massacres
and crimes against humanity that have ever taken place. Those citizens'
chants remind me, frankly, of medieval witch hunts. The Aum spokespeople
complaining about this treatment are right on the mark when they argue that
it is illegal and should be ended.
However, though what these Aum representatives are saying is entirely
true and correct, they demonstrate at the same time a stunning lack of
comprehension of the basic rules that govern human society.
Even if the individual members are not guilty of anything, their
organization clearly is. But has any Aum spokesperson ever held a press conference to apologize for the horrors brought upon Japan by the group's
previous leaders? What about when a group of them decides on a new place to
live? What about visiting the local neighbors beforehand, repeating their
apology and making a promise that they won't cause any trouble?
While such actions are not required by any law, these are the sorts of manners and customs that lubricate interaction between people on a day-to-day basis.
As such, it's no surprise that without any grease between the wheels,
these Aum members are creating friction with the people around them.
Shukan ST: Aug. 6, 1999
(C) All rights reserved
- are up in arms over 〜
- 〜 に対して憤怒している
- spokespeople
- 代表
- counter with 〜
- 〜 で対抗する
- proclamations
- 宣言
- constitutional rights
- 法的権利
- conflicts
- 争い
- take sides
- どちらかの味方をする
- perceiving 〜 to be 〜
- 〜 を 〜 だとみて。
- I cannot remember a time, like now with 〜 when 〜
- 〜 が起こっている今のように 〜 だったことはないと思う
- uproar
- 騒動
- understandably
- 気持ちはよく分かるが
- incomprehensible
- 不可解な
- acts of terrorism
- テロ行為
- merchants' refusal to accept 〜 as 〜
- 商店主が 〜 を 〜 として受け入れないこと
- municipal governments'
- 市政の
- register them as local citizens
- 住民登録する
- blatant violations
- はなはだしい違反
- association with 〜
- 〜 との結び付き
- vast majority
- 大部分
- innocent of any wrongdoing
- 犯罪とは関係がない
- guilt by association
- 有罪人と関係があるために帰される罪、連坐
- stripping of 〜
- 〜 を奪うこと
- justify
- 正当化する
- brutal
- 残忍な
- massacres
- 大虐殺
- chants
- シュプレヒコール(大勢が声をそろえて唱えること)
- frankly
- 率直に言って
- medieval witch hunts
- 中世の魔女狩り
- treatment
- 待遇
- are right on the mark
- 的を得ている
- representatives
- 代表者
- stunning lack of 〜
- 信じられないような 〜 の欠如
- comprehension
- 理解
- govern 〜
- 〜 の基準となる
- press conference
- 記者会見
- horrors brought upon 〜 by 〜
- 〜 が 〜 にもたらした恐怖
- sorts of 〜
- 〜 な種類のもの
- lubricate
- 〜 を円滑にする、 〜 で潤滑油の働きをする
- on a day-to-day basis
- 日々
- grease
- 油
- wheels
- 車輪
- friction
- 摩擦