●英字新聞社ジャパンタイムズによる英語学習サイト。英語のニュース、よみもの、リスニングなどのコンテンツを無料で提供。無料見本紙はこちら
英語学習サイト ジャパンタイムズ 週刊STオンライン
『The Japan Times ST』オンライン版 | UPDATED: Wednesday, May 15, 2013 | 毎週水曜日更新!   
  • 英語のニュース
  • 英語とエンタメ
  • リスニング・発音
  • ことわざ・フレーズ
  • 英語とお仕事
  • キッズ英語
  • クイズ・パズル
  • 留学・海外生活
  • 英語のものがたり
  • 会話・文法
  • 週刊ST購読申し込み
     時事用語検索辞典BuzzWordsの詳しい使い方はこちら!
カスタム検索
 
抄訳付きの社説はThe Japan Times Weeklyからの転載です。Weekly Onlineはこちら


Importance of whaling questioned as the meat rarely sold at home
(From The Japan Times January 15 issue)

 


Japan’s annual whaling season is under way with the inevitable lurid reports and tangled accusations. The history of conflict between Japan’s whaling boats and anti-whaling protesters has not only gained newspaper headlines but has inspired its own TV program, Whale Wars, on the American cable television station Animal Planet, now in its fifth season. The actions of whale-hunting supporters and detractors have reached absurd proportions. Both sides should return to reasonable dialogue.

While officially agreeing to a moratorium on whaling, Japanese whaling companies have continued to kill whales in the South Pacific by taking advantage of a loophole for research purposes. If the hunting is really being done, as stated, for scientific purposes, the results should be opened to public and professional scrutiny, as is done with all serious scientific research. Killing whales for research is a volatile topic with international importance, so it deserves a clear explanation that the general public has easy access to. So far, nothing like that has happened.

This year, the Japanese government allowed ¥2.28 billion from funds allocated for recovery from the earthquake and tsunami to be spent on the whaling expedition in hopes of helping the Tohoku economy, where some of the ships are based. That may not be much out of the ¥12 trillion allocated for recovery, but this whaling subsidy provides little benefit to coastal communities and stymies efforts to reconstruct genuinely sustainable industries. That money could have been used for many other purposes.

This year’s confrontations have escalated in intensity. Kyodo Senpaku Kaisha, the company leading whaling missions, filed a lawsuit last year in U.S. federal court against the anti-whaling group, Sea Shepherd Conservation Society. The whaling company lawsuit accuses the activists of engaging in activities that could cause injury to crew members and damage to vessels.

Resolving the issue in courts would be reasonable, but unfortunately, the actions have been taking place in international waters, outside most jurisdictions, where the law is as undecided as the weather. The Japanese government’s placing Sea Shepherd founder Paul Watson on Interpol’s international wanted list seems a fanciful ploy since most countries around the world have banned whaling and are unlikely to turn Mr. Watson over to anyone.

The Sea Shepherd boats attempting to stop the whalers have increased the level of their engagement this year. Reportedly, they are using laser beams and butyric acid, a dangerous-sounding material that basically provides the bad smell of rancid butter, to harass and stop the whaling expeditions. They have also, in the past, rammed whaling boats and boarded the whalers in open seas. Those actions cross the line from peaceful protest and reasonable monitoring to violent confrontation. Any action that could harm a crew member on either side cannot be justified.

This year, three activists from the environmental group Forest Rescue Australia have been captured and held prisoner after boarding one of the whaling boats, Shonan Maru No. 2. Their fate is still being debated, though Japan has seemingly decided, wisely, to return them to Australian authorities without filing criminal charges. The activists may be stuck on the boat until the end of the whaling season, though, which will perhaps be punishment, or education, enough.

More importantly, the importance of whaling must be questioned. Last year, Japan only caught about 18 percent of its self-imposed quota of some 1,000 whales in the Antarctic Ocean. The traditional custom of eating whale meat has considerably declined. Many reports show that whale meat from whales killed last year is piling up in refrigerated warehouses. All of the facts concerning the stock of whale meat should be made public.

Whale meat was surely an important part of Japan’s heritage and a major source of protein in the lean times after World War II. However, its continued consumption, for either culinary, dietary or cultural reasons, hardly seems compelling at this point.

Continuing the whale hunts means Japan will continue to pay dearly in international diplomatic costs for its right to maintain a tradition that extends far beyond the borders of the country’s culture yet is no longer central to daily life at home.

The Japan Times Weekly: January 28, 2011
(C) All rights reserved
 

日本語の抄訳はウィークリ1月28日号のP18に掲載されています。

英語のニュース |  英語とエンタメ |  リスニング・発音 |  ことわざ・フレーズ |  英語とお仕事 |  キッズ英語 |  クイズ・パズル
留学・海外就職 |  英語のものがたり |  会話・文法 |  執筆者リスト |  読者の声 |  広告掲載
お問い合わせ |  会社概要 |  プライバシーポリシー |  リンクポリシー |  著作権 |  サイトマップ