●英字新聞社ジャパンタイムズによる英語学習サイト。英語のニュース、よみもの、リスニングなどのコンテンツを無料で提供。無料見本紙はこちら
英語学習サイト ジャパンタイムズ 週刊STオンライン
『The Japan Times ST』オンライン版 | UPDATED: Wednesday, May 15, 2013 | 毎週水曜日更新!   
  • 英語のニュース
  • 英語とエンタメ
  • リスニング・発音
  • ことわざ・フレーズ
  • 英語とお仕事
  • キッズ英語
  • クイズ・パズル
  • 留学・海外生活
  • 英語のものがたり
  • 会話・文法
  • 週刊ST購読申し込み
     時事用語検索辞典BuzzWordsの詳しい使い方はこちら!
カスタム検索
 
抄訳付きの社説はThe Japan Times Weeklyからの転載です。Weekly Onlineはこちら


War-renouncing Article 9 of the Constitution must stand firm

 


(From The Japan Times August 15 issue)


 


要約

Japan marks the 67th anniversary of its surrender to Allied Powers in World War II on Aug. 15. This year’s anniversary is different from past anniversaries. It came amid moves by several political parties to change the war-renouncing Article 9 of the Constitution.

In this situation it is all the more important for every citizen to ponder Japan’s modern war in the 1930s and 1940s. The security situation surrounding Japan these days is not easy.

But this should not be used as justification for weakening the principle of pacifism and non-use of force as embodied in Article 9.

War is not a game but a tragic undertaking that causes unbearable suffering and misery. This simple fact cannot be emphasized too much.

In the war, some 2.3 million Japanese soldiers and civilian workers for the military died as well as some 800,000 civilians, mostly victims of air raids, including the victims of the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

It is also often said that some 20 million innocent people in the Asia-Pacific region died as a result of actions by the Imperial Japanese armed forces.

The statement issued by then Prime Minister Tomiichi Murayama on the occasion of the 50th anniversary of the war’s end (Aug. 15, 1995) is an important document that describes the Japanese government’s official view of Japan’s modern war. It says in part: “During a certain period in the not too distant past, Japan, following a mistaken national policy, advanced along the road to war, only to ensnare the Japanese people in a fateful crisis, and, through its colonial rule and aggression, caused tremendous damage and suffering to the people of many countries, particularly to those of Asian nations.”

It must not be forgotten that not only the military and the government but also some segments of the Japanese public favored war. The possibility cannot be ruled out that people fanned by populist or demagogic politicians may lightly alter the no-war principle of the Constitution.

It is all the more important for every citizen to study Japan’s modern history from the viewpoint of preventing the government from dragging the nation into war.

The Japan Times Weekly: August 25, 2012
(C) All rights reserved
 

日本語の抄訳はウィークリ8月25日号のP18に掲載されています。

英語のニュース |  英語とエンタメ |  リスニング・発音 |  ことわざ・フレーズ |  英語とお仕事 |  キッズ英語 |  クイズ・パズル
留学・海外就職 |  英語のものがたり |  会話・文法 |  執筆者リスト |  読者の声 |  広告掲載
お問い合わせ |  会社概要 |  プライバシーポリシー |  リンクポリシー |  著作権 |  サイトマップ