●英字新聞社ジャパンタイムズによる英語学習サイト。英語のニュース、よみもの、リスニングなどのコンテンツを無料で提供。無料見本紙はこちら
英語学習サイト ジャパンタイムズ 週刊STオンライン
『The Japan Times ST』オンライン版 | UPDATED: Wednesday, May 15, 2013 | 毎週水曜日更新!   
  • 英語のニュース
  • 英語とエンタメ
  • リスニング・発音
  • ことわざ・フレーズ
  • 英語とお仕事
  • キッズ英語
  • クイズ・パズル
  • 留学・海外生活
  • 英語のものがたり
  • 会話・文法
  • 週刊ST購読申し込み
     時事用語検索辞典BuzzWordsの詳しい使い方はこちら!
カスタム検索
 

Opinion

How to read war news

By Douglas Lummis


戦争のニュースの読み方

戦争のニュースとなると新聞は誤った情報を掲載することも多い。現地に仲間がいたり、情報が入手できる人たちの中にはもう新聞は読まないと言う人もいるほどだ。しかし新聞を情報源としている私たちにも真実を知る方法はある。

"I don't read the newspapers anymore. They tell nothing but lies!" This bitter outburst came from Dr. Tetsu Nakamura, leader of the Peshawar Association, at a public lecture in Tokyo last November.

Dr. Nakamura spent 17 years in Afghanistan building medical clinics and digging wells. He knows the country, and so we can believe him that the newspapers are full of falsehoods and distortions, as they usually are when war begins.

He, however, gets information from friends and fellow workers in Afghanistan. But most of us, for better or for worse, depend on the newspapers. It is important, therefore, for us to train ourselves in the art of discerning the truth hidden in the fog of distortion.

Reading the newspaper is, indeed, an art. Like most arts, it cannot be reduced to technique. Still, I want to suggest two rules that can be helpful. They are:

1) When reading today's newspaper, don't forget what yesterday's said.

2) Look carefully through the tiny items on the back pages. They may be more important than the headline articles.

To illustrate the first rule, I will give two examples. The first (which I have mentioned in this Opinion column before) is the statement repeated in news reports that Afghanistan's Taliban "refused" to hand over Osama bin Laden to the United States. A few months ago, the papers reported the Taliban saying that it wouldn't hand over bin Laden until it was show n the evidence against him.

The second is an article in the New York Times (Dec. 22) stating that Afghanistan was experiencing "that country's first peaceful transfer of power in decades." But I suppose few readers are capable of the radical forgetting that would be required to swallow that.

To illustrate the second rule, I offer a tiny note at the bottom of page 5 of the International Herald Tribune (Jan. 15). There we learn that U.S. troops are beginning "extensive maneuvers," scheduled to continue for one year, on the southern Philippine island of Basilan, a "hotbed" of Islamic rebels. Training maneuvers in a war zone?

Similarly, on page A19 of the San Francisco Chronicle (Jan. 4) there is an article that states that, now that it has al-Qaeda "on the run from Afghanistan... the United States is stepping up military activities in and around Somalia." Take note of the word "in." And as for "around," where do you suppose that might be?

The following day, the same paper reported (on page 1) that the Israeli military captured 50 tons of weapons allegedly being "smuggled" into the Palestinian Authority. (Why "smuggled"?) The average reader will wonder, how much is 50 tons of weapons? The same paper reported (on page A13) that, two days previously, U.S. warplanes "dropped more than 100 satellite-guided 2,000-pound bombs" on a single target in Afghanistan. That's 100 tons, on one target in one day.

Don't give up reading the newspapers. The information (or much of it) is there. But you have to dig for it.


Shukan ST: Feb. 8, 2002

(C) All rights reserved



英語のニュース |  英語とエンタメ |  リスニング・発音 |  ことわざ・フレーズ |  英語とお仕事 |  キッズ英語 |  クイズ・パズル
留学・海外就職 |  英語のものがたり |  会話・文法 |  執筆者リスト |  読者の声 |  広告掲載
お問い合わせ |  会社概要 |  プライバシーポリシー |  リンクポリシー |  著作権 |  サイトマップ